Why it works
Research on disciplinary literacy finds that as students advance, generic reading strategies matter less than the specialized ways experts in each field read and write: historians source and corroborate, scientists read for evidence and argument, mathematicians read precisely. Content teachers teaching these discipline-specific habits build both literacy and content understanding.
The research: Shanahan and Shanahan on disciplinary literacy.
The run-of-show
Choose your slot. The agenda, timings, and length update to match.
The core activity: teach one disciplinary habit
Teachers leave having planned to teach one discipline-specific reading or writing habit explicitly.
- Pick a text or task in your subject.
- Identify how an expert in your field reads or writes it: sourcing, evidence, precision, argument.
- Plan to teach that specific habit explicitly, not a generic strategy.
- Plan how students practice it with your content.
Facilitator notes
- Identify your discipline's literacy practices.
- Teach them explicitly; it is content, not an add-on.
- Model expert reading in your field.
Adapt it
- <b>Elementary:</b> early discipline habits, reading like a scientist in simple ways.
- <b>Secondary:</b> full disciplinary reading and writing.
- <b>All settings:</b> content teachers teach their discipline's literacy.
Participant handout
One page for every teacher. Print it, or save it as a PDF.
Disciplinary Literacy: read like an expert
<b>Each field reads differently:</b> sourcing, evidence, precision, argument, taught explicitly in content.
- A text or task in my subject:
- How an expert in my field reads or writes it:
- The specific habit I will teach explicitly:
- How students practice it with content:
- Why it is content, not an add-on:
Make it stick
Teach your field's literacy:
- Teach your discipline's reading and writing habits.
- Model expert reading.
- Bring a disciplinary-literacy lesson to the next PLC.