Professional Learning  ›  Inclusion  ›  Workshops  ›  Honoring Students' Names
a ready-to-run workshopHonoring Students' Names
Inclusion · Workshop

Honoring Students' Names (Workshop)

Everything you need to lead this with your staff or PLC: a minute-by-minute run-of-show, what to say, what to hand out, and how to make it stick. Pick the length that fits your slot.

Key takeaway

A name is not a trivial detail; it is tied to identity, family, and culture, so learning to say every student's name correctly, and not anglicizing or avoiding the ones that are unfamiliar, is a small daily act that signals a student belongs, while getting it wrong or dodging it quietly tells them they do not.

Format
PLC / team meeting
Length
45 minutes
Group size
Any (works 4-40)
Who can run it
Any teacher-leader
You will need
Slides (5)Printed handoutYour class rosterA timer
Aligned to
Learning Forward: Rigorous ContentInTASC 2: Learning DifferencesResearch on names, identity, and belonging
Share / assign

Why it works

A student's name is one of the most personal things they bring to school, tied to their identity, their family, their language, and their culture, and how a teacher handles it sends a message about whether that whole self is welcome. This is easy to underestimate, because to a teacher a name can seem like a small administrative detail, but to the student on the receiving end, a name repeatedly mispronounced, carelessly anglicized, shortened without permission, joked about, or avoided entirely because it is unfamiliar, communicates something that accumulates: that they are an inconvenience, that their name and by extension their background is too much trouble, that they do not quite belong here. Research and the testimony of many students, particularly those with names outside the dominant culture, document how wounding this is and how it erodes belonging, and conversely how much it means when a teacher makes the effort to get a name right. The good news is that honoring names is entirely within a teacher's control and does not require perfection, only genuine effort and respect. Several practices make the difference. Learn to pronounce every name correctly, which means asking the student how they say it, listening carefully, practicing, and writing down a phonetic reminder rather than guessing or avoiding, and asking again rather than settling for a wrong version. Do not anglicize or change a name for your own convenience, and do not shorten or nickname it without the student's genuine permission, since a student's name belongs to them, not to the teacher's ease. Treat getting it wrong as something to correct and apologize for briefly rather than to laugh off or give up on, and keep trying. Never signal that a name is a burden, by sighing over it, skipping it in roll call, or asking a student if there is something easier to call them, which teaches the student their name is a problem. Be alert to how peers treat names too, and set a norm that names are respected. And recognize that for some students a name is the single clearest daily signal of whether they belong, so the effort carries weight far beyond its size. None of this is difficult, but it requires caring enough to make the effort and to keep making it. The workshop helps teachers commit to learning and honoring every student's name, with the concrete practices that turn a name from a possible wound into a daily signal of belonging.

The research: Research on names, identity, belonging, and the harm of mispronunciation.

The run-of-show

Choose your slot. The agenda, timings, and length update to match.

    The core activity: learn and honor every student's name

    The heart of the session is committing to say every name correctly and building the practices that turn a name into a signal of belonging.

    A name is a daily signal of belongingMispronouncing, anglicizing, or avoiding a name quietly tells a student they do not fully belong; getting it right tells them they do. It is entirely within a teacher's control and requires genuine effort, not perfection.

    Facilitator notes

    For some students, the clearest daily belonging signalA name is often the single clearest signal, every day, of whether a student belongs, so the small effort to honor it carries weight far beyond its size.

    Adapt it

    Participant handout

    One page for every teacher. Print it, or save it as a PDF.

    K12 Academics · Professional Learning

    Honoring Students' Names: learn it, say it right, respect it

    A name is tied to identity and belonging: learn to say every name correctly, do not anglicize or nickname without permission, and never signal a name is a burden.

    1. Names on my roster I am unsure how to say:
    2. How I will learn them (ask, listen, practice, note phonetically):
    3. Where I may be anglicizing or shortening without permission:
    4. How I correct my own mistakes and keep trying:
    5. The class norm I set so peers respect names:

    Make it stick

    Honoring names is a small daily act that builds belonging. Close by setting the follow-up:

    Common questions

    Some names are genuinely hard for me to pronounce. Isn't trying and failing worse than a simpler version?
    No, genuine effort to say a name correctly, even imperfectly, communicates respect in a way that an imposed simpler version never does. What wounds students is not a teacher struggling sincerely with an unfamiliar name; it is a teacher who anglicizes it, shortens it without permission, avoids it, or signals that it is too much trouble. Students can tell the difference between someone making a real effort, asking how to say it, listening, practicing, apologizing for and correcting mistakes, and someone who has decided their name is an inconvenience to be worked around. So keep trying, ask the student to help you, and accept that you may not be flawless immediately; the effort itself is the respect. Substituting an easier version to spare yourself the difficulty is exactly the move that tells a student their name, and their identity, is a burden.
    Isn't a nickname friendly and normal? Why does it need permission?
    Nicknames can be warm, but only when they come from the student rather than being imposed for the teacher's convenience, which is the crucial distinction. A student who offers a nickname or prefers a shortened form is exercising ownership of their own name, and following their lead is respectful. A teacher who unilaterally shortens or changes a name because the full one is unfamiliar or harder to say is doing the opposite, taking ownership of something that belongs to the student. The test is simple: did the student genuinely choose this, or did you decide it for them? Ask what a student wants to be called and honor the answer, including when the answer is their full name said correctly. A name belongs to the person who carries it, not to the teacher's ease, so permission is what separates a friendly nickname from a quiet erasure.
    With a large roster, is it realistic to get every name right?
    It takes effort, but it is both realistic and worth it, and the effort itself matters even where perfection is hard. Learning names is a normal part of the start-of-year work, and the unfamiliar ones simply need a little more deliberate attention: ask the student how they say it, listen carefully, write a phonetic reminder for yourself, practice, and check back rather than guessing. Across a large secondary load this is more work, but it is still achievable with a system and genuine commitment, and students notice enormously when a teacher makes it. The alternative, defaulting to anglicized or avoided names because the roster is big, communicates to exactly the students whose belonging is most uncertain that they are not worth the effort. Treating every name as worth learning, and showing students you are working at it, is what carries the weight, even on the days you are still getting one right.

    Go deeper

    Build it into a bigger day