Why it works
Schools increasingly want to know whether their SEL efforts are working, and measuring SEL, through observation, surveys, student self-report, and climate data, can inform improvement. But the research and guidance are emphatic about the cautions: SEL measurement should be used for improving practice, not grading students on their character, and not for high-stakes accountability or comparing students, which distorts and harms. Used carefully, for the right purposes, measurement strengthens SEL; misused, it undermines it.
The research: Research and guidance on SEL measurement (CASEL; measurement cautions).
The run-of-show
Choose your slot. The agenda, timings, and length update to match.
The core activity: plan to measure SEL wisely
Teams leave with an improvement-focused, low-stakes SEL measurement plan.
- Clarify the purpose, improving practice, not grading or high stakes.
- Choose appropriate, low-stakes measures (observation, self-report, climate data).
- Plan how you use the data to improve SEL practice.
- Guard against misuse (grading students, high-stakes comparison).
Facilitator notes
- Measure for improvement, not grading.
- Use appropriate low-stakes measures, and guard against high-stakes misuse.
- Focus on practice and climate.
Adapt it
- <b>Elementary and secondary:</b> the same cautions.
- <b>Leaders:</b> use for program improvement.
- <b>All settings:</b> improvement-focused, low-stakes, ethical.
Participant handout
One page for every teacher. Print it, or save it as a PDF.
Measuring SEL: improve, never grade
<b>For the right purposes:</b> low-stakes measures used to improve practice and climate, never to grade or rank students.
- The purpose (improving practice, not grading):
- The appropriate, low-stakes measures:
- How I use the data to improve SEL:
- How I guard against misuse:
- What I will never do with SEL data:
Make it stick
Improve, never grade:
- Measure to improve.
- Keep it low-stakes.
- Bring an improvement from SEL data to the team.