Why it works
The validity of any assessment depends on item quality. Research on assessment design identifies common flaws, ambiguous wording, unintended clues, items that test reading rather than content, questions misaligned to the standard or at the wrong cognitive level, that make results misleading. Writing clear, aligned items at the intended level, and checking them for flaws, is what lets an assessment measure the learning it claims to.
The research: Research on assessment and item design.
The run-of-show
Choose your slot. The agenda, timings, and length update to match.
The core activity: improve a set of questions
Teachers leave having fixed the flawed items in one assessment.
- Take an assessment you use.
- Check each item for clarity, alignment to the standard, the right cognitive level, and unintended clues.
- Fix or replace the flawed items.
- Make sure the item measures the content, not reading speed or tricks.
Facilitator notes
- Check clarity, alignment, level, and clues.
- Match the format to the purpose, and watch reading-load confounds.
- Revise items together.
Adapt it
- <b>Elementary:</b> clear, simple-language items; watch reading load.
- <b>Secondary:</b> aligned items at the right level across formats.
- <b>All settings:</b> clarity, alignment, no clues.
Participant handout
One page for every teacher. Print it, or save it as a PDF.
Writing Better Test Questions: valid items
<b>Measure the learning:</b> clear, aligned, right-level items with no clues or reading-speed confounds.
- The assessment I use:
- Items checked for clarity, alignment, level, and clues:
- The flawed items to fix or replace:
- How I ensure it measures content not reading:
- My revised items:
Make it stick
Clear, aligned, flaw-free:
- Write clear, aligned items.
- Check for flaws.
- Bring a sharpened assessment to the next PLC.