Why it works
Research on history education shows that history is best taught not as facts to memorize but as a discipline of inquiry: sourcing documents (who wrote this, why), corroborating across sources, contextualizing, and building evidence-based arguments about the past. Teaching these historical-thinking skills through primary-source document analysis builds both historical understanding and transferable critical reasoning.
The research: Research on historical thinking (Wineburg; Reading Like a Historian).
The run-of-show
Choose your slot. The agenda, timings, and length update to match.
The core activity: teach a document-based inquiry
Teachers leave with a document-based inquiry that builds historical thinking.
- Pick a historical question worth investigating.
- Select primary-source documents that offer perspectives on it.
- Plan how students source, corroborate, and contextualize them, not just read for facts.
- Have students build an evidence-based argument.
Facilitator notes
- Teach sourcing, corroboration, and contextualization.
- Use primary documents.
- Have students argue from evidence, not just recall facts.
Adapt it
- <b>Elementary:</b> simple sources, who made this and why.
- <b>Secondary:</b> document analysis, corroboration, argument.
- <b>All settings:</b> sourcing, evidence, argument.
Participant handout
One page for every teacher. Print it, or save it as a PDF.
Historical Thinking: interrogate and argue
<b>Inquiry, not memorization:</b> source, corroborate, and contextualize documents, then argue from evidence.
- The historical question worth investigating:
- The primary-source documents:
- How students source, corroborate, and contextualize:
- How students build an evidence-based argument:
- The historical-thinking skill I focus on:
Make it stick
Sources and evidence:
- Teach historical thinking.
- Use documents.
- Bring a document-based inquiry to the next PLC.